Politico, MS NOW, CNN denied access to White House despite judge's order

Signs hang in the media work area at the White House after CNN, MS NOW, and Politico were kicked off the White House grounds by President Donald Trump, in Washington, Wednesday. The trio of outlets remained barred on Thursday despite a judge's order lifting the ban.

Signs hang in the media work area at the White House after CNN, MS NOW, and Politico were kicked off the White House grounds by President Donald Trump, in Washington, Wednesday. The trio of outlets remained barred on Thursday despite a judge's order lifting the ban.(Evan Vucci, Reuters)


Save Story
KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • Despite a judge's ruling, Politico, MS NOW, and CNN reporters were denied White House access on Thursday.
  • It comes hours after U.S. District Judge Tim Kelly blocked President Donald Trump's ban of the networks for 14 days, citing constitutional issues.

WASHINGTON β€” Politico, MS NOW and CNN reporters were barred from the White House ​on Thursday, just hours after a judge deemed President Donald Trump's ban of the three news outlets likely unconstitutional and ordered their access immediately restored.

U.S. District β€ŒJudge Tim Kelly's overnight ruling blocked the ban for 14 days in a major setback for Trump in ⁠one of his biggest battles with the ​media.

The Politico reporter's credentials were also confiscated, ⁠Politico said, after Kelly temporarily blocked Trump's ban. An MS NOW reporter said β€Œshe also was blocked from β€Œthe White House, while CNN said some of its staff members were ⁠denied entry onto the grounds.

MS NOW's Laura Barrón-López, ⁠speaking on the network outside of the White House complex, said it was unclear if her blocked entry was a defiance of the court order or a problem with the White House entry system.

Representatives for the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Kelly, in his order, said the White β€ŒHouse's revocation of the White House credentials of the journalists "likely ​violated their constitutional due process rights." The judge also raised doubts about the Department of Justice's national security arguments for justifying the ban, noting that Trump himself had said the action was due to what the president alleged was false or negative coverage.

Theodore Boutrous, an attorney for the three outlets, praised the ruling in a statement, saying: "This is a strong ruling vindicating freedom of the press, ​due process and the rule of law. We greatly appreciate the court's swift action."

A coalition of β€Œpress freedom groups β€Œand dozens of ⁠news organizations, including Reuters, filed a legal brief on Wednesday supporting the three news outlets.

Trump announced his ban in a social media post on Sept. 18. The three outlets then sued Trump and other members of his administration on Monday, saying the ban violated β€Œthe Constitution's First ​Amendment protections for free speech and a free β€Œpress, as well as their ⁠due process rights.

Contributing: Katharine Jackson and Gram Slattery

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.

Related stories

Most recent Police & Courts stories

Related topics

Reuters
    Susan Heavey

      STAY IN THE KNOW

      Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5.
      By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Notice.
      Newsletter Signup

      KSL Weather Forecast

      KSL Weather Forecast
      Play button