Process to remove fluoride from Utah water systems costly, but will save dollars


88
Save Story
Leer en español

Estimated read time: 1-2 minutes

KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • Gov. Spencer Cox is expected to sign a bill banning fluoride in Utah water.
  • The Weber Basin Water Conservancy District is preparing to remove fluorosilicic acid, a hazardous material.
  • Initial removal costs are high, but long-term savings of up to $300,000 are expected.

LAYTON — Workers with the Weber Basin Water Conservancy District are making early preparations to remove additive fluoride from their systems.

Gov. Spencer Cox is expected to sign HB81 into law, which would ban the chemical from water systems, starting in May.

Scott Paxman, CEO and general manager at the Weber Basin Water Conservancy District, estimates they'll need to remove several thousands of gallons from distribution stations that send the additive into Davis County drinking water.

"There's 10 facilities that we have to clean and remove any remaining fluorosilicic acid out of," Paxman said. "The removal, transport and disposal of the fluorosilicic acid is very regulated because it is a hazardous waste, a hazardous material."

While there is evidence that the chemical can help fight and prevent cavities, Paxman said he is grateful his employees will no longer have to handle it, as it can be dangerous in the highly concentrated form.

"We've got operators that had severe migraines just because of their walking in and out of the building every day," Paxman said. "There's some health effects, definitely because of the off-gassing of the fluorosilicic acid and then the handling of any spills or anything like that."

The exterior of one of the Weber Basin Water Conservancy District’s treatment facilities is seen in Layton Monday.
The exterior of one of the Weber Basin Water Conservancy District’s treatment facilities is seen in Layton Monday. (Photo: Mike Anderson, KSL-TV)

Once the fluoride is out of the system, Paxman said there will be an overall savings, but it will take time. Initially, he said the cost of removing it would offset any savings in the first year.

"Between about $250,000 to $300,000 per year in savings by not feeding the fluorosilicic acid," Paxman said. "That's chemical costs, that's manpower, that's operation and maintenance costs on the buildings."

Those savings will be passed on to the customer but should be very small when divided up per household.

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.

Related stories

Most recent Utah Legislature stories

Related topics

Utah LegislatureHealthUtahPolitics
Mike Anderson, KSL-TVMike Anderson
Mike Anderson often doubles as his own photographer, shooting and editing most of his stories. He came to KSL in April 2011 after working for several years at various broadcast news outlets.

STAY IN THE KNOW

Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5.
By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Newsletter Signup

KSL Weather Forecast

KSL Weather Forecast
Play button