Miley Cyrus must face lawsuit over claims she copied Bruno Mars hit

Miley Cyrus poses during the Oscars arrivals at the 97th Academy Awards in Hollywood, Los Angeles, Calif., March 2. Cyrus lost an early bid to dismiss a lawsuit that accused her of unlawfully copying a Bruno Mars song.

Miley Cyrus poses during the Oscars arrivals at the 97th Academy Awards in Hollywood, Los Angeles, Calif., March 2. Cyrus lost an early bid to dismiss a lawsuit that accused her of unlawfully copying a Bruno Mars song. (Mario Anzuoni, Reuters)


42
Save Story
Leer en español

Estimated read time: 1-2 minutes

LOS ANGELES — Pop star Miley Cyrus lost an early bid to dismiss a lawsuit in California federal court that accused her of unlawfully copying Bruno Mars' song "When I Was Your Man" for her No. 1 hit "Flowers."

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Dean Pregerson rejected Cyrus' argument that Tempo Music Investments, which said it owns a share of the copyright in Mars' song, could not bring the lawsuit.

Tempo is unaffiliated with Mars, who is not involved in the lawsuit.

Spokespeople and attorneys for Cyrus' label Sony Music did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the decision on Wednesday.

Tempo attorney Alex Weingarten of Willkie Farr & Gallagher said on Wednesday that the company is "thrilled but not the least surprised" by the decision and "extremely confident in prevailing" in the case.

Cyrus released "Flowers" on her 2023 album "Endless Summer Vacation." "Flowers" has over 1 billion streams on Spotify and won the Song of the Year Grammy award in 2024.

Tempo sued Cyrus and Sony Music in September, arguing that "Flowers" duplicates "numerous melodic, harmonic and lyrical elements" of Mars' "When I Was Your Man," which topped the Billboard Hot 100 in 2013.

Tempo said in the complaint that it bought its share of "When I Was Your Man" from the song's co-writer Philip Lawrence in 2020. Cyrus and her song's co-writers asked the court in November to dismiss the claims against them, arguing that Tempo lacked standing to sue under U.S. copyright law because it did not have "exclusive rights" to the song.

Pregerson ruled against Cyrus on Tuesday.

"Because Lawrence as a co-owner could sue for infringement, Tempo as co‐owner, in lieu of Lawrence, can sue for infringement without joining the other co‐owners," Pregerson said.

Related stories

Most recent Entertainment stories

Related topics

EntertainmentU.S.Police & Courts
Blake Brittain

    STAY IN THE KNOW

    Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5.
    By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
    Newsletter Signup