Israel questions ICC judge's impartiality in Netanyahu arrest case

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at an army base near Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, Oct. 31. Israel has questioned the impartiality of a judge appointed to a panel deciding whether an arrest warrant should be issued for Netanyahu.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at an army base near Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, Oct. 31. Israel has questioned the impartiality of a judge appointed to a panel deciding whether an arrest warrant should be issued for Netanyahu. (Amir Cohen, Reuters)


Save Story
Leer en español

Estimated read time: 2-3 minutes

KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • Israel questions the impartiality of a judge in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's arrest warrant case.
  • The request for arrest warrants has been delayed by legal challenges and judge changes.

AMSTERDAM — Israel has questioned the impartiality of an International Criminal Court judge appointed to a panel deciding whether an arrest warrant should be issued for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The move could further delay a decision in the case, in which the court's chief prosecutor filed a request in May for arrest warrants against Netanyahu, Israel's then defense minister, Yoav Gallant, and three Hamas leaders over the Gaza war.

The request requires the approval of International Criminal Court judges but their decision has been delayed, partly because of several rounds of legal filings by Israel challenging the court's jurisdiction.

In a further delay, Romanian magistrate Iulia Motoc, citing health grounds, asked last month to leave the three-judge panel that is reviewing the request for arrest warrants. She has been replaced by another court judge, Beti Hohler, who is Slovenian.

The Office of the Attorney-General of Israel said in a statement, dated Monday and seen by Reuters on Wednesday, that Hohler had worked for the Office of the Prosecutor before she was elected as an International Criminal Court judge last December.

"Israel respectfully requests that judge Beti Hohler provide information to clarify whether there are (or are not) grounds to reasonably doubt her impartiality," it said.

"Israel does not suggest that judge Hohler's previous employment with the OTP necessarily or automatically gives rise to a reasonable apprehension of a lack of impartiality," it said. "However, judges of this Court have acknowledged that previous duties within the OTP may, depending on the circumstances, give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias."

Filing the request for arrest warrants in May, the court's chief prosecutor said there were reasonable grounds to believe that Netanyahu, Gallant and the three Hamas leaders had committed war crimes and crimes against humanity. All three Hamas leaders are now dead or believed to be dead.

The court has no set deadlines, but has generally taken about three months to rule on requests for arrest warrants in previous cases.

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.

Related stories

Most recent World stories

Related topics

Israel-HamasWorld
Benoit Van Overstraeten

    STAY IN THE KNOW

    Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5.
    By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
    Newsletter Signup

    KSL Weather Forecast

    KSL Weather Forecast
    Play button